Impact & KPIs
Participant accessibility and representativeness

DCTs have significant potential to reduce logistical barriers and improve accessibility. This can enable the participation of traditionally underserved populations, ensuring that findings are applicable to more segments of the population. However, challenges persist in effectively reaching diverse populations due to varying levels of digital literacy, accessibility constraints, and operational complexities.
Recommendations
How Trials@Home reached these recommendations
While the study design for the RADIAL trial would have been suitable to empirically test how decentralisation of recruitment and trial activities affects the representativeness of the study population, the limited sample size did not allow for a reliable comparison. Thus, empirical research, case studies, semi-structured interviews, and ethics reviews informed these targeted recommendations.
Further reading
Publications
Learning from Remote Decentralised Clinical Trial (RDCT) experiences: a qualitative analysis of interviews with trial personnel, patient representatives and other stakeholders.
Coyle, et al |
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology |
2021 |
|---|
The Impact of Operational Trial Approaches on Representativeness: Comparison of Decentralized Clinical Trial Participants, Conventional Trial Participants, and Patients in Daily Practice
de Jong, et al |
Drug Discovery Today |
2025 |
|---|
Diversity in decentralized clinical trials: Prioritizing inclusion of underrepresented groups
van Rijssel, et al |
BMC Medical Ethics |
2025 |
|---|